What's missing in this story?

From the Associated Press..

A rapist who preys on young men has struck five times in the Houston area since mid-September, and police said Monday there may be even more victims, but they are too ashamed to come forward.

The rapist typically stalks, robs and sexually assaults his victims at gunpoint, apparently choosing them at random and attacking them near or inside their homes, police said. The most recent attack was Nov. 30....

"I think he just sees one that he prefers, and then he begins to follow them and gather information, finding out where they live and watching their house," [Lt. Richard Whitaker of the police department in Baytown, where took of the attacks took place] said. 

Victims have described the attacker as a clean-shaven black man, 18 to 21 years old, 5-foot-6 to 6 feet tall, with a shaved head. 

The victims have all been men in their late teens.

Now if you're wondering if I may have omitted something form the original, please click on the link and read the entire story.

Did you notice that the words "gay" nor "homosexual" did not appear once in the story? Did you also notice that while the story ends with the bombshell that all of the victims are in their late teens (referred to 3 times as "men") the crimes are considered "rapes" and not child molestation. It's outrageous that we are expected to treat a 17 3/4 year-old murderer as a "child" but a 15 1/2 year-old molestation victim as a "man". What kind of pedophile apologists are working at the Associated Press these days?

But, of course, they did mention that the rapist is described as Black, something they generally omit. I guess when you're so busy trying to cover the fact that a violent homosexual is on the prowl for boys to forcibly victimize, letting it slip that he's Black isn't seen as non-PC. That pretty much demonstrates where Black people line up in the politically correct pecking order--somewhere after homosexuals and pedophiles.

Posted by Danny Carlton at December 19, 2006 5:57 AM